In 1969, when US President Richard Nixon initiated to make environmental topics (such as Acid Rain and Greenhouse Effect) to be treated by a third and civil pillar in NATO, it was seen as American attempt to regain international terrain after the lost Vietnam War. It is ironic that when some serious steps were required to be taken (much later though), USA stepped back. To continue with the development of environmental concerns, it took another decade for first World Climate Conference to happen. The main concern of 80s was depletion of the Ozone layer caused by a class of chemical compound called Chlorofluorocarbon (CFC). The Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) was established in 1988 by two United Nations organizations, the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program, to assess the risk of “Human induced climate change”.
The major development in 90s happened in Kyoto, Japan with the adoption of a Protocol (known as Kyoto Protocol) in 1997 which came into force in 2005. Under the protocol, 37 industrial countries commit themselves to a reduction of four greenhouse gases (Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Nitrous Oxide, Sulphur Hexafluoride) and two groups of gases (hydro fluorocarbons and per fluorocarbons) produced by them, and all member countries give general commitments. As of November 2009, 187 countries have signed and ratified the protocol. The most notable non-member of the protocol is the United States of America which is responsible for 36.1% of the 1990 emissions level.
The major contributor to the greenhouse gases are the industrialized, developed countries along with few developing ones. If they cut down on the emissions level, there is a fear that their economies would be in jeopardy. This is the same reason US has been reluctant to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. For developing countries, if they stop industrialization the economic growth would slow down. So no one wants to trade economic growth with environmental concerns. Usage of renewable energy is still minimal. For instance, China’s energy sector is reliant on coal by 70%.
On the other hand, the poor countries are majorly financed by the developed countries. Hence the developed countries would have more bargaining power when negotiating reduction of emissions level. Implicitly, the decisions have to be taken by the developed countries. The European Union has consistently been one of the major nominal supporters of climate issues, negotiating hard to get wavering countries to ratify the Kyoto Protocol.
However, there is complications as per as setting emission level is concerned. China’s emission level is high along with the countries like USA, Russia, Germany, Japan etc. But it also has one fifth of the world population. So the per capita emission is much lower than the developed countries. Moreover, many developing countries are being industrialized in recent times to produce goods which are eventually exported to the developed world. Studies suggest that nearly a quarter of China’s emissions result from production of goods exported to developed countries. Who should take responsibility for that?
Presently, the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference is under way and many hopes are pinpointed here as Kyoto Protocol had objective till 2012. A new protocol or understanding has to be reached as the climate change is visible all around. The decisions have to be made, and fast enough.






